Crisis? What Crisis?
By Ken Nicholson

Well we are about to enter a new speedway season and I wonder what 2009 will bring. Certainly, there are plenty of gloomy predictions about the global economy, as well as everything else for that matter. But I wonder how speedway will fare?

Well the statements coming out after the BSPA Conference in November were very upbeat. So upbeat in fact, they put many a governmental spin-doctor to shame. Building on three-year plans, big strides when other sports will struggle, years of hard work paid off, etc. are all the kind of things you might expect in a parliamentary budget speech. One BSPA representative went as far as to say that one of the main concerns was to protect speedway fans from the current economic climate. I wonder how.

Seriously, I fear that the BSPA continually seems to address the trivial things, while conveniently dodging the bigger and more difficult issues. We associate this trait with governmental politicians also. But there is one big difference between a government and the BSPA. That is everybody must live in a country with a government, but nobody must to go to a speedway match. Tinkering with points limits, tactical rules, doubling up etc. are the minutiae and not really going to make any difference in terms of turnstiles clicking. Rather, the constant tinkering with the rules is more likely to drive folk away.

The BSPA does not recognise that admission prices are a main barrier to speedway's popularity. It is evident for all to see that when a special offer is run alongside a televised match, the stadium is full to bursting. Start charging usual prices again and the new supporters evaporate and any televised matches are in front of sadly depleted crowds once more. What could be a more clear demonstration that the entrance costs are too high? Yet the BSPA trots out comments such as 'great value' and 'reasonable price'. More spin I am afraid. Great value and reasonable prices are relevant only if you can afford them. Rolls Royces are probably great value for money and reasonably priced for what they are, but there is another reason why I don't have one.

So what went wrong? Well somewhere along the line speedway entrance costs were inflated at a rate seldom seen outside developing countries. To illustrate the point, I stumbled across an old Canterbury programme from 1976. The programme was 10p and the cost of the Second Division Four Team Tournament (at King's Lynn) was advertised as 50p. Today's comparable prices would be about twenty to thirty times these prices. In comparison, since 1976 a gallon of petrol (I still think in gallons) has gone up about 6 times, the RPI (retail price index) by 5 times, and beer and cigarettes by about 10 times. The average wage has gone up by about 10 times and even house prices have gone up by only about 15 times (although they are coming down again at a seemingly alarming rate). Hardly any wonder then why the terraces are no longer packed.

Speedway is about being affordable entertainment. It is not a sport in the sense that the only thing that matters is the result. If it is not affordable or it is not entertaining, then its days are numbered. 2008 was a year in which the global economy went belly-up. The BSPA needs to look at the business models it used for speedway over the last decade or so and remember they are likely to have been about as good as the ones that were used by the banks. Cut costs, cut admission prices, provide entertainment and the rest will look after itself. But I can't see it happening (and to be fair it is not as easy as I make it sound). Meanwhile we will continue with our 'race day magazines', struggling to Heat 12 to 'get a result', riders jetting around Europe (and beyond) so that points limits are met and of course, the ubiquitous slick tracks.

I think 2009 is the crunch year for speedway because the promotions are going to have to work very hard for their custom. Then again, I always have been a pessimistic old ****!

This article was first published on 31st January 2009