Home Contact Us Stadia Pix Articles All About You Riders to Remember
DVDs Books Pictures Archive Dream Teams Programme Generator
23/02/2020
Len Read
The Internationale 1968
Your Feedback
 
16/02/2020
Celebration of Speedway
The Internationale 1967
Your Feedback
 
09/02/2020
Manuel Trujillo
The Internationale 1966
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
02/02/2020
My First Sporting Hero
The Internationale 1965
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
26/01/2020
Max Grosskreutz Controversy
The Internationale 1964
Your Feedback
 
19/01/2020
The Internationale 1961
The Internationale 1962
The Internationale 1963
 
13/01/2020
Josef Angermuller
It's All About You: Peter Lipar
Your Feedback
 
05/01/2020
Olsen and the Bees
Riders In The Sky
Your Feedback
 
29/12/2019
Another Oval Gone
It's All About You: Mel Hubbard
Plus Points
 
22/12/2019
The Molyneux Mystery
Speedway Researcher Update
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
15/12/2019
All to Play for at Oxford
Brandonapolis - Part 6.
Your Feedback
 
10/12/2019
National League Classics
Test Match Special
Sam Ermolenko Racing
 
30/11/2019
Book Review: Hitchhiker's Guide
Brandonapolis - Part 5
Sim Speedway
Plus Points
Your Feedback
 
03/11/2019
Louis to Race New Weslake
Brandonapolis - Part 4
Your Feedback
 
27/10/2019
All About You: Andrew Gallon
Brandonapolis - Part 3
Your Feedback
 
12/10/2019
There is Another Sun
Brandonapolis - Part 2
 
03/10/2019
DVD Review: Simon Cross
Brandonapolis - Part 1
Your Feedback
 
15/09/2019
When Ian Met Ove
Updated: Dagenham Mystery
Your Feedback
 
06/09/2019
Is Speedway All-In?
Dagenham Mystery
 
21/08/2019
Book Review: Brough Park
NZ World League - Part 7
Your Feedback


Conference Constraints - Doomed to Failure....by Dave Green
05/02/2005

Jason Lyons

I used to be a huge fan of averages. I could pore over lists of stats for hours on end and, sadly, found them to be endlessly fascinating. I think the thing I liked most was their simplicity. A simple number told me everything I needed to know about a rider. I could tell exactly how good he was, who he was better than, and how important he had been to his team. Few other sports could encapsulate a performer's worth in such a non-subjective manner.

Nowadays, I scarcely look at them. It's all become far too complicated.

In years gone by a rider's average was a simple calculation that yielded an unambiguous result. Over recent years the increasing number of complexities, variations and exceptions have made it virtually impossible to determine a rider's average. The number of arguments over averages has also increased dramatically.

Just this winter we have seen Jason Lyons and Stuart Robson as central figures in the latest average wars. It seems that Lyons cannot revert to his 2004 Elite League average to ride in the 2005 Elite League, however Robson can use a 2003 Premier League average in the 2005 Premier League. That Robson's average was attained while 'doubling down' and Lyons came from his matches as a regular Elite League rider only increases my confusion. These decisions are clearly totally inconsistent and I'd love to hear the official justification for the discrepancy.

Another case that baffled me was the move of Eric Carrillo from Wolves to Glasgow last season. He was able to drop down on a three point average because the bonus points he scored in the Elite League were ignored when calculating his new Premier League average. I can never recall that happening before, although it may have, but it appeared to be a rather convenient way of ensuring that this Wolves' asset could be accommodated at another club.

The Elite League this season has elected to exclude bonus points from the averages they use for team building. This is an excellent move in my book, it's a much fairer means of comparison than the inflated averages that well balanced teams can often accrue. My only beef is that the Premier League hasn't followed suit, thus we now have the two leagues using similar but different methods of controlling team strengths. Is there really a need for this?

I remain convinced that a points limit, based on averages, is the best way forward for the sport. It ensures that no club becomes too strong but it does not constrain team building in the way that grading systems do. All I'd like to see is a straightforward, transparent and consistent method of assigning averages to riders - is that really too much to ask?

 

This article was first published on 15th January 2005

[ Use Mobile Version ]
 

 

Comment on this Article | Contact Us | Go Back to Main Menu

   Please leave your comments on this article or on the site as a whole