Home Contact Us Stadia Pix Articles All About You Riders to Remember
DVDs Books Pictures Archive Dream Teams Programme Generator
Irish Eyes Were Smiling
Plus Points
Your Feedback
King's Lynn - 1
Plus Points
Your Feedback
Speedway in Germany 1933
Dream Team : Kevin Huggett
Plus Points
Your Feedback
The Bill Allen Mystery
Your Feedback
The Ipswich Witches
The Danger of Winning
Your Feedback
Australia 70/71
Canterbury Noise Trials
Your Feedback
2020 Review - Part 8
Kualar Lumpar 2007/08
Your Feedback
2020 Review - Part 7
Shanghai 1930
Your Feedback
2020 Review - Part 6
Singapore 1930
Your Feedback
2020 Review - Part 5
Peter Clark
2020 Review - Part 4
Still Flying High
Your Feedback
2020 Review - Part 3
Harold MacNaughton
Your Feedback
Olle Nygren
2020 Review - Part 2
Your Feedback
2020 Review - Part 1
Your Feedback
Debut: Joe Screen
Plus Points
Your Feedback
Review: Blood & Cinders
Your Feedback
Tai Deserves a Gong
The J.A.P is Modern Art
Plus Points
Your Feedback
Snapshots of Yesteryear
Snapshots of Yesteryear
Snapshots of Yesteryear
Plus Points
Your Feedback
The Polish Problem
Mauger, Nielsen. World Finals.
Plus Points
Your Feedback
Simon Wigg Racing Plus!
Review: Saving Speedway
Great Races of the 70s/80s
The BLRC 1984
Plus Points
Your Feedback
Book Review: Dave Jessup
The BLRC 1983
Leif "Basse" Hveem
Your Feedback
When Did it Start to Decline?
The BLRC 1982
Tracking Down the Swagman
Your Feedback
Review: Before Air Fences
Your Feedback
Review: Who Gates Wins
The BLRC 1980
Owlerton in the Sixties
Plus Points
Your Feedback
Doyle's Triple Crown
The BLRC 1979
Your Feedback
New Cross Album 1936
The BLRC 1978
Your Feedback
Sheffield 60s & 70s
The BLRC 1977
John Pilblad
Your Feedback

Craven Shield Needs a Revamp
By Keith Butler

I would like to see the BSPA consider a much needed re-vamping of the Craven Shield. Now that it is established, particularly, as the end of season 3-team tournament we should be asking whether it could be improved. The concept of a 3-team tournament is good. It's different, unusual even, and potentially gives rise to some close battles and exciting meetings. 18 heats, with 3 teams battling it out, gives the fans better value for money.

Its problem is that it's too "bitty". No sooner have you watched your team's riders, they're then missing from a race and can't affect the score. There's 6 out of the 18 races (33%) that your team has no involvement in and, as a biased spectator, you have less interest in. In short, it's a pretty mundane format of racing at present.

Wouldn't it be better to have a format in which each team were involved in every race - without resulting to 6 riders per race (come to think of it with a bit of handicapping that might be more interesting to. but no)

Apologies now for the tedious formula bit, that's about to follow.

I would like to propose a new race format. One that still maintains the 6 riders per team with each having 4 rides over 18 heats. Each rider however will race against 5 of the 6 opponents from each opposing team. He gets 2 rides with a team partner & 2 singularly. I've used Coventry, Swindon & Belle Vue purely as an example; with Cov. being the home team, Swin. being away team 1 & B Vue away team 2 in this instance.


HeatRed - Gate 1Blue - Gate 2Green - Gate 3Yellow - Gate 4
1.Cov 5BV 1Cov 6Swin 6
2.Swin 1Cov 3Swin 2BV 2
3.BV 3Swin 5BV 4Cov 4
4.BV 1Swin 3BV 2Cov 2
5.Swin 5Cov 1Swin 6BV 6
6.Cov 3BV 5Cov 4Swin 4
7.Cov 1BV 3Cov 2Swin 2
8.BV 5Swin 1BV 6Cov 6
9.Swin 3Cov 5Swin 4BV 4
10.Cov 2Swin 6BV 5Swin 5
11.BV 6Cov 4Swin 3 Cov 3
12.Swin 4BV 2Cov 1BV 1
13.Swin 6BV 4Cov 3BV 3
14.BV 2Cov 6Swin 5Cov 5
15.Cov 4Swin 2BV 1Swin 1
16.Cov 6Swin 4BV 3Swin 3
17.Swin 2BV 6Cov 5BV 5
18.BV 4Cov 2Swin 1Cov 1


Obviously over the 3 legs each team would take the configuration for home team, away team 1 & away team 2 accordingly.


Some of the rules governing this format would need discussing, but generally these appear to be the main ones:

(i) Heat leaders should be positioned according to averages with top average rider at 1, second at 3 & third at 5. Other riders positioned at team managers discretion.

(ii) I believe a No. 7 should be nominated who can replace any team member if required, probably with a maximum number of rides (say 6)

(iii) To catch back a deficit I would allow up to 2 tactical "double" rides per team. These would only apply to riders racing singularly (not in a team pair). This could kick in when teams are 7 points behind the leaders.


A final few points worth noting with this proposed format:

(a) All riders get to start from each gate position once.

(b) Second string riders are given the more favoured gates (1 & 2) for the latter stages of the meeting.

(c) The home team has a marginal disadvantage in that they only get 1 ' back to back' occurrence of pairs races, whilst the other teams get 2.

(d) As all riders only race singularly twice Team managers may be faced with some tricky choices as the meeting progresses, if they start to fall behind, with the tactical double rule stated above being used.


Now I'm pretty sure someone with a better grasp on race layout could enhance my format further, but I believe the foundation is there for a real improvement in the meeting format. The Craven Shield would get a fresh impetus and the fans get full involvement throughout the whole meeting.


This article was first published on 29th November 2007


  • Mick Cast:

    "There's a saying K.I.S.S - keep it simple stupid. The really simple answer is make it a four team tournament. Most people who go to speedway and some of those who may be newcomers, could understand the four team format, and it gives you more races so lots more V.F.M value for money. "

    [ Use Mobile Version ]


    Comment on this Article | Contact Us | Go Back to Main Menu

  •    Please leave your comments on this article or on the site as a whole